European Reformation FAQ

*** LAST UPDATED 2016!

In this section question and answers about the draft proposal will be published. Until March 19 questions can be sent to the committee on erc@toastmastresd95.org.

 

Why is reformation necessary?

Since district 59 was reformed in 2014 to create districts 59 & 95 the number of clubs in Continental Europe has continued to grow. This is great because it offers more people the opportunity to benefit from the Toastmasters program. However it also makes it more challenging for district leaders, including area and division directors, to support clubs and effectively fulfill responsibilities to individual members. At the same time the chance of taking up leadership opportunities may reduce and the costs of running the district increase.
In December 2015 D59 has 203 paid clubs and D95 has 229 paid clubs. Once a district has 200 clubs it can apply to the Board of Directors at Toastmasters International to request permission to begin the reformation process.
This approval was given in August 2015.

What factors does the reformation committee consider during the analysis process?

The Governing Documents of Toastmasters International details the following factors:

  • Reformed districts will have no fewer than 100 clubs each
  • Number of clubs, club strength, growth trends, growth potential, population, education, languages spoken, and geographic influences for all districts
  • Reasons why the reformation is in the best interests of the members, the clubs, the districts, and Toastmasters International
  • Marketing plan projecting growth and identifying key market opportunities for all districts
  • Succession plan identifying qualified future leaders in all districts
  • Financial projections demonstrating the anticipated income and expense for all districts

Who will be able to vote on the proposal?

The proposal will be presented to both district councils (D59 & D95) for their consideration. Only members of each district council: Club Presidents, VPs Education (or their proxy holders), Area & Division Directors, Administration Manager, Finance Manager, PR Manager, Club Growth Director, Program Quality Director, District Director and Immediate Past District Governor will be eligible to vote.

When and where will I be able to see the proposal for the new structure of Toastmasters Districts in Continental Europe?

The proposals will be presented to the district leaders at their meeting in February 2016 and after this will be made available on your district website for everyone to see.

What are the projected numbers of clubs?

How did you calculate the estimated numbers of clubs?

What languages will contests be held in in each of the proposed districts?

Districts can choose to hold up to 4 contests each year in a language other than English. This decision is made by the district director and has to be approved by the District Executive Committee. (Policy 6.0 Speech Contests)

Any decision about future speech contests would be made by the leaders of the newly created districts.

Which of those proposed districts would be district 59 and which would be district 95?

When a district is reformed, the district number is given to the new district with the oldest club in its boundaries. In district 59 the oldest club is Bossuet Gavaliers in Luxembourg and the number 59 will go to district B in the proposal. The number 95 will go to district C because the oldest club in district 95 is Ramstein Speakers Bureau. The other districts would be assigned their number by World Headquarters by July 1st 2017.

Was it considered to create Germany, Austria and Switzerland as one district?

The task given to the reformation committee by the districts was to prepare a proposal that was in line with Toastmasters policy and would create districts that were operationally manageable and sustainable. In the process of reformation new districts need to have at least 100 clubs which are geographically adjacent to each other.
The possibility of combining Germany, Switzerland and Austria in a single district was considered but encountered some challenges:
The district that would be created would have had approximately 160 clubs at the time of reformation and within 2 years would begin thinking about reforming again. Meaning this combination would be short-lived. It also made it difficult to construct adequate districts around this one with strong countries with enough leaders and resources to be sustainable.
One option considered was to divide the country of Germany to make a district of an adequate size but the consultation with division directors from Germany indicated that this was not a desirable option for them and also was not desirable for the district leaders or for Toastmasters International.
Also considered was that in the last reformation the district did not want to create a German block of countries. In the proposal combining Austria with Switzerland gives a possibility of shared interest in the German language within that district.

How did you consider financial feasibility?

Using the standard practice to calculate district budgets and the restrictions of expense categories a draft budget was prepared for each proposed district considering three situations: if no growth in membership occurred, if only 8% growth occurred and if the estimated growth is achieved.  The document shows the detail of this.

Were the projections for club & member numbers made before the
increased membership dues were announced? Do you expect the increased dues to affect the projected numbers?

When we received notice of the planned dues increase in February we took a number of steps:
we spoke to the leaders of both districts to ask for their view on the impact of the increase and we looked at the impact of the last dues increase in 2011.
The last dues increase was in October 2011 and what we noticed then was that the number of dual memberships in the district decreased but overall membership growth was unaffected and club growth continued. Here is a link to the membership payment graphs  http://dashboards.toastmasters.org/District.aspx?id=59&hideclub=1
The district leaders in consultation with the committee believe that because we calculated different growth rate options, even considerably lower than these countries show now, we will still grow enough clubs and members to create the proposed districts.

What happens if actual club & member growth numbers during 2016 and 2017 don’t match the projections? Can the plan be revised? Does the whole process start all over again?

Once a district is in the reformation process, as we are, it is subject to periodic review by the Board of Directors. If the club and or membership growth were to deviate significantly they could change the proposal. However it is unlikely that the whole process would begin again.

One comment

Comments are closed.